Should You Switch to Usage-Based Billing? Calculate Your ROI First
Bas de Goei
Did you know that misclassifying contract costs is one of the most common ASC 340 compliance errors for SaaS companies?
In this article, we'll demystify ASC 340 and break down how it applies to prepaid expenses and SaaS accounting. We'll explore the key concepts, benefits, and best practices for compliance. The goal? To help you navigate this accounting standard with confidence.
You'll also learn:
First and foremost, let’s explain what ASC 340 really is.
ASC 340 is an accounting standard. It outlines how companies should report costs associated with obtaining and fulfilling contracts. It works in conjunction with ASC 606, which governs revenue recognition. Essentially, ASC 606 tells you when to recognize revenue, while ASC 340 guides you on how to account for incurred costs along the way.
Think of it this way: A company might spend money on sales commissions to win a new customer or invest in resources to deliver on a project.
ASC 340 provides a framework for categorizing these costs. It helps determine whether they should be expensed immediately or deferred, and how to amortize them over time.
At its core, ASC 340 provides guidance on accounting for other assets and deferred costs, including prepaid expenses and costs associated with customer contracts.
ASC 340-10 addresses prepaid expenses, outlining how companies should report costs paid in advance for goods or services to be received in the future.
On the other hand, ASC 340-40 specifically deals with the incremental costs of obtaining a contract, such as sales commissions.
ASC 340 plays a vital role in how SaaS companies report their financials and make key decisions. Here's why:
To really grasp ASC 340, it's important to understand its core components. Let's break down the key concepts:
These are costs directly associated with acquiring a new customer contract. Think of expenses like sales commissions, bonuses tied to specific sales targets, and certain legal fees incurred during contract negotiations.
But here's the catch: Not all costs to obtain a contract can be capitalized. Only those considered incremental — meaning they wouldn't have been incurred if the contract hadn't been obtained — qualify.
For example, a sales commission is incremental, but general advertising costs are not. Those non-incremental costs are expensed as they occur.
Once you've landed the contract, you'll likely incur costs to set up or deliver the services. These costs could include implementation fees, setup costs, training expenses, or even costs for customizing your software for a specific client.
ASC 340 provides guidance on when these costs can be capitalized. The key criteria are:
If these conditions are met, the costs are recognized as an asset and amortized over time. Otherwise, they're expensed as incurred.
Capitalized costs don't just sit on the balance sheet forever. They need to be systematically amortized over the expected customer contract period.
This process means gradually recognizing those costs as expenses in each accounting period, reflecting the transfer of goods or services to the customer.
But what happens if the contract changes? ASC 340 also addresses how to adjust amortization for contract modifications or terminations. For instance, if a customer churns or cancels their contract early, any remaining unamortized costs may need to be expensed immediately.
ASC 340 requires companies to periodically assess capitalized costs for impairment. This process involves checking whether the value of those assets is still recoverable.
Various factors can trigger impairment, such as increased customer churn, contract cancellations, or changes in market conditions that affect the expected benefits from the contract.
If the carrying amount of the capitalized costs exceeds their recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized. This ensures that the company's financial statements accurately reflect the true economic value of its contract-related assets.
Let's see how ASC 340 plays out in real-world scenarios for SaaS companies:
Complying with ASC 340 can bring tangible benefits to SaaS companies, strengthening their financial reporting and boosting stakeholder trust. Here's how:
ASC 340 promotes a more accurate picture of a SaaS company's financial performance. By requiring the capitalization and amortization of certain contract costs, ASC 340 aligns those costs with the revenue they generate.
It provides a clearer view of profitability over time, smoothing out the impact of upfront expenses as well.
Imagine a SaaS company that spends a notable amount on sales commissions to acquire new customers. Without ASC 340, those commissions would be expensed immediately, potentially creating a large upfront expense that distorts the company's true profitability in that period.
However, by capitalizing and amortizing those commissions over the customer's contract life, the expense is recognized gradually, providing a more accurate reflection of the costs and revenues associated with that customer.
ASC 340 fosters consistency in how SaaS companies report their contract costs. This standardization facilitates comparisons across companies and industries, making it easier for investors and analysts to evaluate financial performance and make informed decisions.
Standardized reporting under ASC 340 can simplify audits and reduce the risk of accounting errors. By following clear guidelines, companies can guarantee their financial statements are accurate and reliable, minimizing the potential for discrepancies or misinterpretations.
Compliance with ASC 340 shows a company's adherence to accounting best practices and financial transparency. This level of compliance can enhance investor confidence and reduce perceived financial risk.
Investors are more likely to trust companies that adhere to recognized accounting standards. ASC 340 compliance signals that a company is dedicated to accurate and transparent financial reporting, reducing the uncertainty surrounding its financial performance.
Moreover, by accurately reflecting the costs and revenues associated with customer contracts, ASC 340 can help SaaS companies present a more stable and predictable financial picture. This predictability can be particularly attractive to investors.
Staying on top of ASC 340 can seem daunting, but with the right approach, it doesn't have to be. We’ll now share some best practices to make compliance smoother and more efficient for SaaS companies. Let’s take a closer look.
Accurate tracking of contract costs is essential for ASC 340 compliance. Instead of relying on manual spreadsheets and cumbersome processes, consider using automated tools to capture and categorize expenses.
Many software solutions can easily integrate with your CRM and accounting systems to track sales commissions, implementation costs, and other contract-specific expenses. Using the right tools not only saves time but also reduces the risk of errors.
Develop and document clear accounting policies that specifically address ASC 340. Define the criteria for capitalizing versus expensing costs, including outlining which types of expenses qualify for deferral and how they should be amortized.
Ensure consistency in applying these policies across different teams and contracts. This clarity helps avoid ambiguity and confirms everyone is on the same page.
ASC 340 and ASC 606 are intertwined. Integrate your ASC 340 compliance procedures with your revenue recognition practices. Doing so helps confirm that the recognition of contract costs aligns with the timing of revenue recognition, avoiding discrepancies and providing a cohesive view of your financial performance.
Remember: These two standards work together to tell the full story of your customer contracts.
Modern accounting software can make a big difference in ASC 340 compliance. Look for platforms that specifically support ASC 340 and ASC 606 requirements.
These platforms often automate amortization schedules, provide impairment testing tools, and generate reports tailored to these standards. You’re not only simplifying compliance but also freeing up your finance team to focus on more strategic tasks.
ASC 340 can influence key performance indicators (KPIs) and guide strategic decisions for SaaS companies. Let's explore how.
By allowing the capitalization of certain contract costs, ASC 340 can improve a SaaS company's short-term profitability.
When costs are deferred instead of expensed immediately, it reduces upfront expenses, boosting metrics like EBITDA. This can be particularly beneficial for growing SaaS companies that invest heavily in sales and marketing to acquire new customers.
However, the impact of ASC 340 on profitability isn't just a short-term phenomenon. As capitalized costs are amortized over the contract lifecycle, they align with the revenue generated from those contracts.
This approach provides a more accurate and consistent view of profitability over the long term, smoothing out the impact of upfront expenses and giving a clearer picture of the company's underlying financial performance.
ASC 340 can provide valuable insights into customer lifetime value (LTV), a crucial metric for SaaS companies. By linking capitalized acquisition costs to LTV, companies can make more informed decisions about customer acquisition and retention strategies.
For example, if a SaaS company capitalizes the sales commissions paid to acquire a new customer, it can track those costs alongside the revenue generated from that customer over time.
Companies can then assess the true profitability of acquiring and retaining that customer, taking into account the upfront costs as well as the ongoing revenue stream.
Churn, the rate at which customers cancel their subscriptions, is a critical factor for SaaS companies. ASC 340 requires companies to consider churn risk when assessing the impairment of capitalized costs.
If a company has a high churn rate, it may need to recognize impairment losses on capitalized costs sooner, as the expected future benefits from those contracts may be reduced.
This metric highlights the importance of proactive churn management strategies to minimize customer cancellations and maximize the value of capitalized costs.
By closely monitoring churn rates and conducting regular impairment testing, SaaS companies can ensure their financial reporting accurately reflects the economic reality of their customer contracts.
We've explored the ins and outs of ASC 340 and how it impacts SaaS companies. Now, let's talk about how the right billing platform can simplify compliance and empower you to implement the recurring revenue model that best suits your business.
Orb is a done-for-you billing platform that goes beyond just generating invoices. It provides the tools and insights to optimize your recurring revenue strategy, whether you're a budding startup or a scaling enterprise.
Here's how Orb can simplify compliance with ASC 340 and ASC 606:
Ready to let Orb help in simplifying your ASC 340 compliance? Explore our flexible pricing options to find the perfect fit for your business.
See how AI companies are removing the friction from invoicing, billing and revenue.