50 annual recurring revenue (ARR) statistics that define SaaS growth in 2026

Teams
Segments

2025-2026 SaaS benchmarks, supplemented by clearly labeled historical, cross-industry, and adjacent-market research on pricing, engagement, billing, and customer outcomes
The SaaS industry faces a persistent challenge: keeping customers. Vena reports average annual B2B SaaS churn at 4.9% in 2025. A historical 2018 CallMiner study estimated that customer switching cost U.S. businesses at least $136 billion annually across multiple sectors. Recent benchmarks do not support one universal churn rule, but pricing design can be a material retention variable. In Focus Digital's 2026 dataset, usage-based pricing was associated with lower churn than single flat-rate pricing, while Vena's 2025 benchmark notes that usage-based or freemium models can have higher churn in other contexts. Orb's usage-based billing engine is designed for flexible, accurate billing and supports usage-based and hybrid pricing, customer-specific price changes, and usage-management alerts.
Churn rate measures the percentage of customers or revenue lost over a specific period. For SaaS companies, this metric serves as a critical health indicator, revealing whether the business is retaining customers effectively or losing recurring revenue faster than acquisition efforts can replace it.
Customer churn occurs when subscribers cancel their subscriptions, fail to renew, or otherwise stop paying for a service. Understanding customer attrition patterns helps companies identify which segments are at risk and what interventions might retain them.
Vena reports an average annual SaaS churn rate of approximately 3.8% in 2025, while noting that churn varies significantly across segments and business models.
Vena reports average annual B2B SaaS churn of 4.9% in 2025.
Looking at subscription businesses more broadly, Recurly reports an overall churn rate of 3.60% across all industries. The page says all figures are updated with July 2026 data, so this is a Recurly subscription-network benchmark rather than a 2025 SaaS-only statistic.
Lighter Capital's 2025 B2B SaaS startup benchmark shows median revenue churn rising from 11.34% in its 2024 benchmark to 12.50% in its 2025 benchmark. Lighter Capital says the underlying financial metrics come from 155 private B2B SaaS startups, with data recorded from 2020 to 2024 and aggregated across five years.
Accurate churn measurement requires consistent methodology. Orb's basic churn rate formula divides the number of customers lost during a period by the total customers at the beginning of that period, then multiplies by 100.
To calculate monthly customer churn:
Vitally reports 3.5% total B2B SaaS churn, with 2.6% voluntary and 0.8% involuntary. The displayed components total 3.4%, so the figures should be understood as rounded source values rather than an exact arithmetic decomposition.
In Focus Digital's 2026 dataset, 74% of churn is voluntary and 26% is involuntary.
Recurly reports 2.34% average voluntary churn across all industries on its subscription-business benchmark page, which it says is updated with July 2026 data. This is a cross-industry Recurly network figure, not a SaaS-only benchmark.
Recurly reports 1.25% average involuntary churn across industries on its benchmark page, which it says is updated with July 2026 data. Orb's collections automation supports proactive reminders, payment retries, and automated customer communications, capabilities relevant to failed-payment recovery.
Understanding what constitutes "good" SaaS churn requires context. Benchmarks vary dramatically based on company size, target market, pricing model, and industry vertical.
Focus Digital's 2026 customer-segment table reports that SaaS providers serving enterprise customers with 1,000 or more employees show 1.2% monthly churn and 13.6% annual churn. The source attributes lower churn in this cohort to multi-year contracts, averaging 24.3 months, and procurement processes involving multiple stakeholders.
Vena's 2025 table reports 3% to 7% monthly churn and 30% to 58% annual churn for SMB SaaS, with higher churn attributed to price sensitivity, contract flexibility, and less brand loyalty. Vena also notes shorter contract terms and lower switching costs for SMBs.
Focus Digital reports that organizations with fewer than 10 employees show 8.9% monthly churn and 69.1% annual churn in its 2026 dataset.
Fullview reports 6.5% monthly customer churn for early-stage companies below $300K ARR.
Focus Digital's 2026 company-stage table reports that pre-product-market fit companies below $1M ARR show 8.2% monthly churn and 67.8% annual churn.
The data reveals a notable relationship between pricing model and retention, but the direction is not universal across datasets. Focus Digital's 2026 report shows lower churn for usage-based pricing, while Vena's 2025 benchmark says usage-based or freemium models can experience higher churn in other contexts.
Focus Digital reports 2.1% monthly churn for usage-based or consumption pricing, the lowest monthly churn among the pricing structures in its table. This is an association within that dataset rather than proof that usage-based pricing alone causes lower churn.
Focus Digital reports 22.9% annual churn for usage-based or consumption pricing in its 2026 pricing-model table.
Focus Digital reports 3.9% monthly churn and 39.1% annual churn for per-seat or per-user pricing in its 2026 pricing-model table.
Focus Digital reports 5.6% monthly churn and 52.1% annual churn for single flat-rate pricing, the highest churn rates among the pricing structures shown in its 2026 table.
Stax Bill reports that multi-year contracts around 2.5 years or longer have an average churn rate of 8.5%, compared with over 16% for month-to-month contracts.
Vitally's Baremetrics-derived table reports 6.2% user churn and 6.7% revenue churn for the under-$10 ARPU cohort.
Vitally reports 5.0% user churn for the over-$250 ARPU cohort, the lowest user-churn rate in its displayed ARPU table. It notes that these accounts often involve more complex onboarding, deeper integrations, and greater organizational dependencies, making switching costly.
Recurly's July 2026 network data shows that the $10-25 ARPC band has the highest overall median annual churn rate at 4.29%. Recurly uses ARPC, average revenue per customer, and $10-25 is the lowest ARPC bracket shown.
For enterprise SaaS, Recurly reports that the $250+ ARPC cohort has 3.54% median annual churn, with involuntary churn at 0.18% in its July 2026 network data. On the same page, Recurly's general cross-industry ARPC table lists 3.07% total churn for the over-$250 cohort, so the 3.54% figure should be read as enterprise-SaaS-specific rather than as the overall high-ARPC benchmark.
Predicting churn before it happens enables intervention while customers can still be retained. Modern analytics can surface account-risk signals, while Orb's Experience Kit provides usage and pricing visibility that helps customers plan and optimize usage.
In UserMotion's 2024 benchmark, based on a survey of approximately 1,000 B2B SaaS companies, 46% said they had started integrating churn-prediction models into their workflows. This is a 2024 adoption statistic, not 2025 data.
Spyrosoft reports that a Telecom churn dataset test using Google Vertex AI AutoML achieved 88.6% precision at a 0.7 confidence threshold. This is one telecom-model result, not an industry-wide SaaS precision benchmark.
McKinsey reported that one leading telecom operator reduced churn by 10-15% over 18 months after developing more than 50 offers and rapidly launching and measuring campaigns for customer microsegments. This is a historical telecom advanced-analytics case, not a 2025 SaaS or AI-powered churn-prevention benchmark.
The Business Research Company reports that the customer journey analytics market reached $17.35 billion in 2025. This is an adjacent analytics-market statistic rather than a SaaS churn benchmark.
Understanding why customers leave requires examining both quantitative patterns and qualitative feedback. The data reveals several consistent drivers.
Pendo's 2025 benchmark says software products retain about 30% of users after three months, meaning roughly 70% are not retained over that period. Pendo measures user retention rather than customer or subscription churn.
A 2025 Oracle publication states that an estimated 67% of customer churn can be avoided with effective First Contact Resolution. This is a broad customer-service statistic, not a SaaS-specific churn benchmark.
This is a broader consumer customer-experience statistic: Stax Bill cites that 58% of consumers will switch companies to find better customer service.
Agile Growth Labs cites a broader benchmark in which 18% of companies actively prioritize retention. This should not be treated as a new 2025 SaaS survey result.
Focus Digital reports 1.8% monthly churn and 19.8% annual churn for Infrastructure and DevOps SaaS, the lowest monthly churn among the verticals in its 2026 table.
Recurly's subscription-network data reports 4.99% median annual churn for Education, split between 3.30% voluntary and 1.69% involuntary churn, as of July 2026. This is not an Education SaaS-only statistic.
Lighter Capital reports that customer churn for SaaS startups in the Education vertical doubled from 11% in the 2024 benchmark to 22% in the 2025 benchmark. The finding applies to Lighter Capital's startup sample rather than the education SaaS sector generally.
Lighter Capital reports that SaaS startups in the Healthcare vertical exhibited a 67% increase in revenue churn in its 2025 benchmark. The claim is scoped to that startup sample.
Effective retention requires systematic approaches across product, pricing, and customer success. Orb's Price Evolution supports pricing experiments and simulations to compare and optimize price models, alongside customer-specific rollouts and spend-threshold alerts designed to maintain transparency and avoid surprise bills.
Bain's classic cross-industry loyalty research found that a 5% increase in customer retention can increase profits by 25% to 95%. This is a longstanding cross-industry benchmark, not a 2025 SaaS measurement.
Software Equity Group's 2Q24 public-software data found that companies with net revenue retention above 120% had a median EV/TTM revenue multiple of 9.3x, a 63% premium to the total SEG SaaS Index median of 5.7x. This is a historical public-market valuation benchmark, not a 2025 private-SaaS valuation rule.
Vitally states that acquiring a new customer costs five times as much as retaining an existing one. This is a broad customer-economics benchmark cited on the page, not a fresh 2025 SaaS measurement.
Custify states that 78% of customers will refrain from churning as long as customer service is good. This is a broader customer-service statistic, not a SaaS-specific churn benchmark.
Recurly's 2026 State of Subscriptions data reports that 38% of consumers prefer pausing over canceling. This is a 2026 subscription statistic, not 2025 data.
On its benchmark page, which Recurly says is updated with July 2026 data, nearly 1 in 4 new subscriptions comes from a previously canceled customer.
While churn measures loss, retention rate measures the percentage of customers who continue subscribing. These complementary metrics provide different perspectives on the same underlying dynamic.
Vena says more than half of the companies in the study it discusses reduced churn year over year, most often by leaning into retention-focused practices such as customer success investment, flexible plan options, pause features, loyalty incentives, and stronger billing processes.
Lighter Capital's 2025 B2B SaaS startup benchmark reports median customer churn of 16.25%, compared with 16.21% in its 2024 benchmark. Its underlying financial dataset aggregates records from 155 private B2B SaaS startups collected from 2020 to 2024.
All else equal, reducing churn extends customer lifetime and increases CLTV without requiring higher prices or upsells.
In Focus Digital's 2026 pricing-model table, usage-based pricing shows 47% annual expansion revenue, compared with 18% for per-seat pricing and 3% for single flat-rate pricing. This is a dataset-specific association rather than a universal causal law.
Focus Digital's 2026 pricing-model table reports that hybrid base-plus-usage pricing shows 2.8% monthly churn, 29.4% annual churn, and 32% annual expansion revenue.
Billing infrastructure shapes the pricing and recovery options a company can offer. Orb's usage-based billing engine supports flexible and customer-specific pricing, usage-based and hybrid monetization, and usage-management alerts, capabilities that can help teams reduce billing friction and align billing more closely with how customers consume value.
Focus Digital's 2026 involuntary-churn table reports that expired credit cards account for 42% of involuntary churn and have a 68% average recovery rate.
Focus Digital reports that insufficient funds account for 31% of involuntary churn and have a 34% average recovery rate in its 2026 dataset. The source frames these figures as categories of involuntary churn, not as shares of every payment failure.
Recurly reports $1.6 billion recovered in 2025 through its combined payment-recovery stack, including intelligent payment retry, smart dunning, account updater, and other services working together. Orb's finance workflows support advanced dunning, configurable payment retries, customer communications, and recovery workflows for overdue invoices or failed payments.
Focus Digital's 2026 dataset reports lower churn for usage-based pricing than for single flat-rate pricing, alongside higher expansion revenue. That relationship is meaningful, but it should not be treated as a settled industry-wide causal rule, especially because Vena's 2025 benchmark notes that usage-based or freemium models can experience higher churn in other contexts. Potential retention advantages of flexible pricing include:
For SaaS teams that need pricing flexibility across billing, customer experience, and collections, Orb brings usage-based and hybrid pricing, Price Evolution for customer-specific pricing changes and spend controls, usage visibility, collections workflows, and advanced dunning into one revenue design platform. This breadth helps teams iterate on monetization while reducing billing friction and supporting retention.
A good annual churn rate depends on your market segment and pricing model. Vena says a good B2B SaaS churn rate is generally considered below 5% annually, while its benchmark table shows materially higher rates for SMB-focused SaaS. The best benchmark is comparing against similar companies in your segment with comparable pricing structures.
All else equal, churn rate and CLTV have an inverse relationship. Reducing churn extends customer tenure, increasing the total revenue opportunity from each retained account. Bain's classic research found that a 5% increase in customer retention can increase profits by 25% to 95%, although that figure is cross-industry rather than SaaS-specific. Additionally, longer-tenured customers can create more opportunity for expansion, further increasing CLTV beyond simple tenure extension.
Flexible pricing can support retention, but the evidence should not be read as universal causal proof. In Focus Digital's 2026 dataset, usage-based pricing shows 22.9% annual churn versus 52.1% for single flat-rate pricing, which is about 56% lower based on those reported annual rates. Vena's 2025 benchmark, however, notes that usage-based or freemium models can have higher churn in some contexts. Orb provides the billing infrastructure and Price Evolution capabilities needed to implement and adapt flexible pricing models.
Customer churn counts the percentage of customers who leave, treating all accounts equally regardless of size. Revenue churn measures the percentage of recurring revenue lost, weighting larger accounts more heavily. A company could lose many small accounts (high customer churn) while maintaining most revenue (low revenue churn) if large accounts stay. Both metrics matter: customer churn indicates product-market fit breadth, while revenue churn shows financial health.
Billing transparency can support retention by helping customers understand and manage usage, pricing, and spend. Orb's Experience Kit supports customer-facing usage and pricing experiences, including dashboards that help customers plan and optimize usage, while Price Evolution supports spend alerts and pricing changes designed to avoid surprise bills. These capabilities can reduce billing friction and support trust as part of a broader retention strategy, without assigning a specific churn-reduction percentage to billing transparency alone.



See how AI companies are removing the friction from invoicing, billing and revenue.